National Institute for Engineering Ethics Essay

NIEE buzz offd hydrogens Daughters to raise awareness of the estimable aspects of applied science wreak, advance knowledge and perceiveing of professional standards and overt obligations and expectations, improve skills in moral reasoning, and strengthen personal dedication to exemplary postulate. Executive Producers were Joseph Herkert, Michael Loui, William Marcy, Steven Nichols, and Jimmy Smith. The entire NIEE Executive Board members served as Senior Investigators and technological Advisors. Discussion QuestionsProfessional Issues1. argon there honourable implications to Henry, a lobbyist, hosting the senator on his expensive yacht? 2. Is there a legal or honest detain to the level at which Henry should host the senator? 3. Is there an accepted code of practice or ethics for lobbyists? If not, suggest a few ethical statements for lobbyists. 4. Was it ethical for Henry to pull strings to get Julie her internship? 5. To what extent should engineers ingest the political factors and social impacts to their plan work? Ethics and New Technology Issues6. What are the responsibilities of engineers when evolution new technologies whose risks are heavy to foresee?7. If GUIDME has the best technology, why should cost and other factors matter?8. Because the experience base for a new technology is limited, it is difficult to write technical specifications. If engineers believe that the specifications are in up to(predicate) for future needs, should they recommend a system with characteristics exceeding those specifications? Conflict of Interest9. Was it appropriate for Henry and his daughters to work on the same disgorge for different parties?10. How should Laura and Henry put on handled their apparent divergence of interest?11. How should Laura and Julie have handled their apparent conflict of interest?12. Was Laura given the project because of her engineering talents and work ethic or because of Henrys connections? If so, this might be a conflict of interest. If you are involved in a conflict of interest, what should you do? Gender Issues13. Does the appropriate response to sexual harassment depend on the setting for example, whether one is in a situation with ones peers vs. with ones supervisor? 14. Are sexist comments disguised as jokes acceptable?15. Would Henry or the senator have treated events differently if either or both of Henrys children had been sons?16. Does the fact that Laura and Julie are attractive enter into any part of the interaction? Should it?17. Is there a glass ceiling telephone number in this story?18. How should the engineering profession address either the glass ceiling with the mens club issue?19. Is it permissible for a staminate employee to put his hand on a fe mannish employees shoulders? Or vice versa? For a male employee to put his hand on another male employees shoulders?20. Is it permissible for a male employee to complement the female employees appearance? Or vice versa? Intellectual Prope rty Issues21. What is proprietary information?22. Are there ethical limits to what the sisters can share with each other active their work?23. Is it appropriate for an engineer to discourse work matters with family members?24. How should employees and engineers decide whether to share nigh of their information from work when they go home?25. When and why might using unlicensed software be unethical?26. Is Julie justified in geting harmed by the fact that some work she did for OUTOCAR was used as a dissertation without giving her credit? Issues for Henry27. What were the unethical actions of Henry?28. What, if anything, did Henry do that was ethically laudable?Issues for Laura29. What were the unethical actions of Laura?30. What, if anything, did Lara do that was ethically laudable? Issues for Julie31. What were Julies unethical actions?32. What, if anything, did Julie do that was ethically laudable?33. As anew employee, one of the limits to the engineering work that she should p erform? Issues for other characters34. Given that the project was assured for GUIDEME, was it appropriate to assign the OUTOCAR project to Warren and Martys team up?35. Could Warren have do anything to swat the chain of unethical actions? How could he have ethically acted with the least residual damage?36. Which of Barrys actions were ethical? Unethical?37. Was Julie treated appropriately by Barry, Warren, and Marty? 38. Was Martys treatment of Warren harassment?39. Should Laura have said something about Martys treatment of Warren (like she did about the ogling of Julie)?40. Which of Jeffs actions were ethical? Unethical? seclusion Issues41. Given that biometric information is information about the physical condition or characteristics of individuals, is there a problem with collecting biometric information about individual fomite drivers and passengers?42. Does tracking vehicle location cause a violation of privacy?43. Why might a central computer network be more than threatenin g to individual privacy and information security than a decentralized system?44. Should individual privacy rights be trumped by the law enforcement and safety benefits to the semipublic from collecting such information? Vice versa? Legal, regulatory, and political issues45. Should Sen. Bob every accused himself from the investigative committee? If not, why not? Is there anything that he should have done differently as a member of the committee?46. How does an organizations cop culture affect how engineers practice? How might it affect transaction with ethical issues? With legal issues? Effective Communications47. One team meeting is marked by tensions about getting the projector started. Do ethical obligations suffer when the team is dysfunctional? Is some degree of disagreement appropriate? When does conflict become counterproductive?48. If you were to develop an ethical corporate ororganizational culture, how would you encourage workers to feel comfortable about speaking freely about ethical, safety, and legal issues, and see such discussions as an obligation?49. What are some standards the leadership of an organization should consider when creating an environment that creates good working and communication conditions? How would you set the appropriate standards? How would you make sure that you have communicated those standards potently so that people not only understand them but also believe you are serious about them? 50. Two organizations have an obligation to host sensitivity training for their managers and their engineers?51. What is society taught people about sensitivity training?52. How can sensitivity training be brought into the organizations leadership practices?53. How can sensitivity training be subsumed into the organizations culture?54. What do you think you would do to promote trust and respect among your colleagues and other professionals in other departments? Safety issues55. Do accidents just have been or are they caused?56. Whose co mmunication channel is it to make sure that reasonable care and attention is given to safety?a. The engineer designer?b. The Department of Transportation employee?c. Anyone who observes the problem?57. . Did both designs involve an adequate margin of error?58. Since complete safety is unobtainable and safety comes at a cost, what is a reasonable amount of protection from failure? Making Decisions59. What would engineering codes of ethics say about Henrys activities? About Lars?60. When making final decisions, was Henry trying to meet his ethical obligations within the constraints that he had?61. What options did Henry have?62. What options did Lara have?63. What options they Julie have?64. What did you have done if you would beena. Henry?b. Lara?c. Julie?65. Do you think that you would receive the same degree of criticism from your organization if you violated ethical standard compared to violating or missing a deadline or an objective?66. Do you put ethical issues on the same leve l of importance as business objectives? Should you? Important elements of business relationships67. What is the most critical element of effective relationships? Loyalty? Obedience? Money? Trust? Openness? Candor? Something else?68. What role should trust duck soup in our professional and personal interactions?69. What role should candor play in a professional or personal relationship? 70. Would candor imply effective communications?71. Could you envision one definition of ethics being those activities and practices that enhance trust? Why or why not?72. Although you will gain galore(postnominal) things during a professional career, other things can be taken away from you. Your job could be taken away (and it often is during economic downturns).a. What things can neer be taken away, unless you allow them to be? Can your reputation for integrity be taken away?b. List several ways you could protect that reputation.73. if soulfulness says I trust you, how does this make you feel a bout the relationship Guidance for the futureIn our day-to-day work, we tend to look up to our leaders, supervisors, and/or bosses for counseling and inspiration about how we conduct ourselves. If we imagined that we were the boss, we might ask additional questions. Imagine that you wont an organization, have all the necessary money, and need to decide what to produce, where to produce it, how to produce it, and how to set up your organization.74. What specific actions could you take as the boss to make sure that everyone in your organization felt that they should conduct themselves to the highest standards of professional conduct and professional ethics?75. What specific attributes would you havent placing your organization to make sure that happened?76. What would you do to make sure that everyone in your organization conducted themselves to the highest professional and ethical standards? Would some of the following actions come to mind?a. Clearly define your expectations ofprofe ssional/ethical actionsb. communicate those expectations effectively and continuouslyc. Live the standards personally. What people see in actions is what theyre going to believe.d. Create candor and open communication in the environment so that anyone within the organization feels free to bring up and discuss their thoughts, opinions, and ideas, but most of all, they feel free to bring up their concerns, problems, and news, be it good or bad, without fear of suffering some sort of retribution or reprisal.